June 19, 2008
My cousin just sent me one of those pithy twists on a
fable set to modern day issues. In this case it was a
"turn-the-tables" story of the Grasshopper and the Ant.
The original version attributed to Aesop describes an
ant who works hard in the withering heat all summer
long, building his house and laying up supplies for the
winter. The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and
laughs and dances and plays the summer away. Come
winter, the ant is warm and well fed. The grasshopper
has no food or shelter, so he dies out in the cold.
The libertarian moral is the focus on individual
achievement, and less government interference help breed
success for many.
The twisted version sent by my cousin takes on a current
political theme on who to vote for in 2008, though the
original "modern" version is attributed to Pittsburg
talk show host Jim Quinn who wrote it in 1994, and has
been making the email rounds since 2002 (See
http://www.warroom.com/antgh.php.)
Here is what I received:
The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer
long, building his house and laying up supplies for the
winter. The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and
laughs and dances and plays the summer away.
Come winter, the shivering grasshopper calls a press
conference and demands to know why the ant should be
allowed to be warm and well fed while others are cold
and starving. CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN, and ABC show up to
provide pictures of the shivering grasshopper next to a
video of the ant in his comfortable home with a table
filled with food. America is stunned by the sharp
contrast. How can this be, that in a country of such
wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so?
Kermit the Frog appears on Oprah with the grasshopper
and everybody cries when they sing, 'It's Not Easy Being
Green.' Al Sharpton stages a demonstration in front of
the ant's house where the news stations film the group
singing, 'We shall overcome.' Jesse then has the group
kneel down to pray to God for the grasshopper's sake.
Liberal politicians exclaim in an interview with
Larry King that the ant has gotten rich off the back of
the grasshopper, and both call for an immediate tax hike
on the ant to make him pay his fair share. Finally, the EEOC drafts the Economic Equity & Anti-Grasshopper Act
retroactive to the beginning of the summer. The ant is
fined for failing to hire a proportionate number of
green bugs and, having nothing left to pay his
retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the
government. A law firm represents the grasshopper in a
defamation suit against the ant, and the case is tried
before a panel of federal judges that were appointed
from a list of single-parent welfare recipients. The ant
loses the case. The story ends as we see the grasshopper
finishing up the last bits of the ant's food while the
government house he is in, which just happens to be the
ant's old house, crumbles around him because he doesn't
maintain it. The ant has disappeared in the snow. The
grasshopper is found dead in a drug related incident and
the house, now abandoned, is taken over by a gang of
spiders who terrorize the once peaceful neighborhood.
As cute as this is, it is analogous to the recent
pounding that oil executives took on Capitol Hill in May
of 2008 by both Democrats and Republicans of the Senate
Finance Committee asking why Exxon and all the other
"Evil Oil Empire" folks dared to make a large legal
profit from their businesses.
Congress: "Profitable Businesses Hurt America"
The New York Times reported on 9 June that Senator Arlen Specter,
Republican of Pennsylvania, said Exxon’s annual profits
increased from $11.5 billion to $40.6 billion in the
past five years and there was no explanation for “why
profits have gone up so high when the consumer is
suffering so much.” Senate Democrats recently announced
an energy package that would tax “windfall” profits of
the five companies. They went on to report Senator
Richard Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, accused the
corporate executives of ignoring the plight of people
suffering because of high energy prices. “Where is your
corporate conscience?” he asked them. Furthermore the
New York Times reported Senator Leahy of Vermont stating “The
issue is simple, People we represent are hurting, the
companies you represent are profiting.”
Politics - The "first" refuge of the non-Creative and
Unimaginative Self-Important Megalomaniac
If you look at all the people on the Judiciary Committee
conducting the inquisition (Patrick J. Leahy, Edward M.
Kennedy, Arlen Specter, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Orrin G.
Hatch, Herb Kohl, Charles E. Grassley,
Dianne Feinstein, Jon Kyl, Russell D. Feingold, Jeff
Sessions, Charles E. Schumer, Lindsey Graham, Richard J.
Durbin, John Cornyn, Benjamin L. Cardin, Sam Brownback,
Sheldon Whitehouse, Tom Coburn,) only three have ever
started or ran a business. They are Herb Kohl from
Wisconsin joined the family business and over the next
23 years helped expand Kohl's to include one hundred
grocery and department stores. Kohl focused on
philanthropic activities after selling the business in
1979 and purchased the NBA Milwaukee Bucks in 1985.
Richard J. Durbin, started a law practice in
Springfield, Illinois, Tom Coburn, opened a medical
practice in Muskogee, Oklahoma.
So here we have a committee of politicians of whom only
one has run a real business, pontificating to men of
action about how their profitable businesses that employ
tens of thousands of people is contributing to the
suffering of so many Americans. This delusional
arrogance is akin to telling Tiger Woods how to play a
better round of golf AND how his past wins have
demoralized bad golfers to the effect that part of his
winnings should go to help provide free lessons to
masses of unfortunate duffers (i.e. windfall profits
tax.)
As of this writing, America is $9 Trillion in debt and
Congress controls the purse-strings of America. I have
never been employed by a poor person, and for all their
collective personal wealth, those committee members
except for Kohl has ever employed anyone or made any
tangible contributions to the wealth of America.
My real disappointment is with the oil executives who
fail, in front of the cameras in an open door committee
session to point this out.
My advice to these and other business executives who
truly keep this country running is...stop shrugging --
start punching. A good shot in the mouth may bring
politicians back to reality. The energy problem will not
be solved by the likes of mediocre politicians and
government employees, Greenpeace, Sierra Club, or others
who only thing in terms of absolutes.
So, will the grasshopper win? With the thinking of the
Senate Judiciary Committee, it appears that the stupid
and lazy have a right to inherit the earth.
In the film
Things Change, Don Ameche recalls an alternate version
where in the end, the grasshopper eats the ant.
_____________________________
"Politicians cannot create jobs or wealth. Such is
axiomatic to straight thinkers." --
Greg Perry
_____________________________
See all references to the Grasshopper and the Ant story
at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ant_and_the_Grasshopper
If you still believe that the government can run a food
business better than an ant, check out Ron Miller's Blog
article at
http://teamronmiller.com/reflections/?p=42